TX Attorney General Opinion. Ground Water District Authority.Amending Permits.
The Question answered by the Attorney General’s Office: Whether a groundwater conservation district (GWD) may amend a historic or existing use permit in specific circumstances
What’s the answer, can these permits be amended?
- It is a question of fact that can be reviewed by the courts
- Chapter 36 of the Water Code most likely requires fairness in that GWD actions cannot “give an advantage to a historic or existing permit holder who seeks new use approval that is not available to other new use permit applicants”
What’s the rational?
- Cannot just look to the Court in Guitar
- GWDs also have to look to Edwards Aquifer case
- Together these cases mean: “ a change in the purpose ofthe proposed use ofwater to be produced under a historic or existing use permit is a new use, even if the new use would occur within the district.”
Any other big points in this opinion? Yes…
- “district has sufficient discretion to accept an owner’s surrender of a portion ofthe right to produce under a historic or existing use permit”
- “A district must apply its new-use requirements uniformly to all requests for new uses, whether the request appears in an application to amend a historic or existing use or in an application for a new use permit.”
KP-0216 (2018)