TX Supreme Court Says Hello Groundwater, Brief Reading Time

  • October 14, 2014

Briefing is underway for a controversial groundwater case before the Texas Supreme Court. A pecan farmer was denied permits to water his pecan trees by the Edwards Aquifer. The pecan farmer argues the denial of the permit was a taking of his property. For all you land use lawyers, yes, the land owner is claiming an inverse condemnation. [Bragg v. Edwards Aquifer Authority]

2013 Refresher: Common Carrier Point of Order

  • October 13, 2014

The Railroad Commission is in the midst of controversial rule making about which entities qualify as common carriers, because of last session’s HB 2748.

Texas needs to move its rich oil and gas resources around the state and country. Moving oil and gas to and fro requires traversing land. Land is owned by private individuals who love their private property rights, which makes getting access to build pipelines complicated. In 2013, a bill tried to address this issue. But,many private property right activists viewed HB 2748 as harming private property rights.  HB 2748 was killed on a very elegant point of order and never re-emerged again. 

The author of HB 2748 has retired from the Legislature, but the issue will be back for round 2 in 2015. Private property rights activists are engaged now more than ever before. Hold onto your hats it will be a bumpy ride.  [HB 2748 (2013)]

2013 Refresher: State Water Plan Funding

  • October 13, 2014

In 2013 the Legislature passed SJR 1 and HB 4 which created new funding mechanisms for funding the statewide water plan. Part of this new funding structure included $2 billion from the Texas Rainy Day Fund. [HB 4 (2013)]  [SJR 1(2013)]

The Texas Water Development Board has a plethora of materials on its website about the legislation and the rule making that followed. [TWDB]  There are a number of other resources as well; such as the Texas A&M Water Resources Institute that publishes the Texas Water Journal

 

Refresher: SAO Report on Brazos River Authority

  • October 13, 2014

In August the State Auditor Office issued a report on the Brazos River Authority. The Big Picture:       

  • The Authority substantially complied with state requirements and Authority policies and procedures for financial management.
  • The Authority has implemented processes to ensure that its compensation decisions and pay actions are supported and authorized.
  • The Authority has implemented processes for funding and managing capital projects.
  • The Authority had sufficient documentation supporting its decision to shut down and decommission its hydroelectric facility at Possum Kingdom Lake.
  • The Authority should strengthen some of its information technology controls.

[SAO]

 

 

Want to sue to stop the new EPA power plant rules? Not so fast.

  • October 8, 2014

A Nebraska judge today ruled that it’s too early for the State of Nebraska to challenge the EPA’s new carbon limits for new power plants. When the judge dismissed Nebraska’s challenge, he stated:  ” The state cannot sue in federal court to challenge a rule that the EPA has not yet actually made.” 

Timing is everything, in life and in court. [The Hill]

 

State Auditor: Most Groundwater Districts Following the Rules

  • October 6, 2014

The State Auditor selected 12 groundwater districts to review. They’re generally doing a really good job. What’s key about this SAO report is that it breaks down the statutes and rules that groundwater districts should be following. It’s a clear and concise primer on groundwater districts. [SAO Groundwater District Audit] 

P.S. California just enacted groundwater statutes for the very first time. California has a big, bad drought too which led to groundwater regulation. [Sacramento Bee] 

 

 

AG Opinion Request: School Districts Seek Productive Mineral Rights

  • October 6, 2014

The Webb County Attorney raises an interesting question about exploring mineral deposits on  lands held by school districts. The specific energy related question he wants the Attorney General to answer:

May a public school district expend funds pursuant to Texas Education Code§ 45.105(c) for the management of County School Lands so that the public school district may determine ifthe lessee ofthe mineral estate is carrying out its duty to explore and develop said mineral estate, and so that the public school district can determine if they are receiving the proper revenues and proceeds for mineral exploration from the lessee? [AG Opinion Request]

TPPF: Surface and Groundwater regulations impede function of water markets and infringe on property rights

  • October 3, 2014

TPPF tells us groundwater is the answer to our future water needs. Groundwater is privately owned, minimally regulated, and abundant. Math has the golden ratio, TPPF has white papers with golden conservative nuggets.

October’s TPPF golden white papers include:     
To read Water Rights Amendments: Changing Times, Changing Uses, visit: http://txpo.li/water-rights-amendments
 
To read Groundwater Conservation Districts: Opportunities for Reform, visit: http://txpo.li/groundwater-conservation-reform

 [TPPF]  

Patent Trolls, The Texas Legislature is Watching

  • October 3, 2014

Blue Spike is being called a patent troll. Filing 45 patent infringement claims in two weeks raises red flags. Especailly after June US Supreme Court rulings requiring greater specificty in patent infringement claims.

The texas Legislature is looking to state solutions for businesses that were targetted by trolls. Solutions include state legal claims against the trolls. 

[EFF on the US Supreme Court Rulings] [Above the Law] [TX House Committee on Techonology Interim Charge]

How to Alienate Friends- Build a Drilling Waste Plant in Rural Texas

  • October 3, 2014

Trash has to be sent somewhere. But, no one wants a trash pit in their neck of the woods. Even less popular than trash is drilling waste.  

Where to dispose of drilling waste? Not in Nordheim, TX, population 315. The arguments against it are the same as they would be in Austin or Dallas. The waste facility will affect land use & will negatively impact property values.  

The Railroad Commission apears inclined to approve the permit. The commission looks at the impact on groundwater. The citizens of Nordheim want their concerns heard.  [Texas Tribune] [Learn about Nordheim]

A Fish Walks into the Supreme Court. The fish Wants Protection.

  • October 1, 2014

The Delta smelt lives in California waterways. The Endangered Species Act protects it. California has a drought. The fish dies if water is re-routed. The Pacific Legal Foundation is asking the US Supreme Court to protect it.

Why are delta smelts and spotted salamanders getting so much US Supreme Court time? In 1978 the US Supreme Court decided TVA v. Hill which is what allows endangered species to trump everything. [PLF]

Lawyer Poaching: V&E Wins

  • September 30, 2014

Vinsons and Elkins lured an energy deal maker away from Bracewell & Giuliani. The WallStreet Journal wrote  “Mr. (Michael) Telle specializes in energy deals including mergers and acquisitions, initial public offerings and tender offers.”  [WSJ]

 

Oil Field Workers Need Accommodations, Moving to Canada not an Option

  • September 30, 2014

It takes a lot of human capital to run oil fields. Those humans need to sleep somewhere. A Houston based company that provides accommodations for oil field works discovered the tax implications of booming business. The company considered converting to a REIT, but hot summer days led to a better conclusion- move to Canada. Not only does Canada offer cooler summers but is also offers a lower tax rate for this C-Corp. The 25-26% tax rate in Canada is roughly 4% lower than the US tax rate on the C-corp’s income.  [Financial Post]

 

What happens when pipelines need to be replaced? New eminent domain issues emerge.

  • September 30, 2014

Pipelines age. Botox for pipelines is called replacement. When replacement means re-routing the pipeline, land owners sue.  A federal district court in Pennsylvania granted summary judgment for the land owners finding that replacement requires that the pipeline use the same footprint. The Third Circuit issued a deeply split opinion that will forecast many future suits throughout the country as pipelines are replaced. The split opinion generously defines replacement. The pipeline isn’t required to be in the same spot. A quarter of a mile to a mile away is good enough for the Third Circuit. That’s some leeway.   [The Legal Intelligencer] [Columbia Gas Transmission v. York County]

Pay Interest to Royalty Owners, Especially To a Church

  • September 29, 2014

NM Supreme Court ruled that parties cannot contractually eliminate interest on royalties held in a suspense account. Preventing the accural of interest on these royalty payments amounted to a violation of a clear public policy and was thus unenforceable. 

Words matter. Words matter in contracts. Words matter in bills. Words matter in statutes. 

Cartels are Diversifying By Stealing from Oil Industry

  • September 25, 2014

Mexico recently de-regulated its energy market, creating a plethora of opportunities for enterprising companies. It’s a energy business’ dream to enter the nascent and booming markets south of the border. Businessman will find themselves with some new challenges such as illegal pipeline taps. The cartels are also enterprising businesses. Cartels discovered they can tap Mexico’s existing oil pipeline system and have been syphoning off what could amount to billions. Figures show that nearly 2500 illegal oil taps have been drilled in 2014 alone. [Houston Chronicle] 

 

Broad Tax Base Say Hello To My Little Friend, Property Tax Exemption for Pollution Control

  • September 25, 2014

Power Producers install heat-recovery steam generators to increase the efficiency of power production. More efficiency leads to greater pollution control, which leads to a tax deduction. Or, does it? According to TCEQ the steam generators were installed to improve production, not to reduce pollution. Therefore, no tax deduction. The 16 Counties which sought an administrative stop to the removal of millions of dollars from the property tax rolls via this clever deduction can now claim victory. [Houston Chronicle]

AG plays fast and loose with Southern NM water

  • September 21, 2014

New Mexico farmers have the right to pump underground water during time of drought. they got this right through an agreement and a desire to not be litigated out of business. Its a compact that has worked for more than 100 years, but an aspiring politician wants to stop these farmers from accessing water. [NM Politics.net]

TX Supreme Court. December 4th. Water Well Owner vs. Oil Drilling Company

  • September 5, 2014

Tempers have flared. A Well owner claims contamination. A drilling company claims defamation. No one is happy. 

The water well owner claims 2011 tort reform protects his free speech to claim contamination.  Lawyers wants to clarification. Courts around Texas have not been applying the 2011 SLAPP reforms uniformly. Everyone wants to know the rules fo the game. [NYT]                     

RRC Rule Controversy Percolates

  • August 15, 2014

A Pipeline “ticked off” a cattleman. Said cattleman is President of the Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association.  Messing with Texans isn’t wise, messing with Texas cattlemen far less than wise.    [TSCRA] [Star Telegram]

Dallas Morning News: Proposed RRC Changes Revive Eminent Domain Debate

  • July 25, 2014

 
Have the requirements set by the Texas Supreme Court in Denbury been met by the RRC rules? We’ll have to let the Courts tell us. The final word will be handed down by the Legislature which will determine how Texas Grows & respects private property rights. [DMN]

$235,000 in Campaign Contributions Rooted in Eminent Domain Fight

  • July 25, 2014

A landowner seeking to route a pipeline around his property has contributed more than $235,000 to certain water board members. A handful of related lawsuits ensued.  [Ft. Worth Star Telegram]

Aljazeera: Texas Supreme Court Rolling Back Eminent Domain Authority

  • July 18, 2014

Naturally, everyone should look to Texas when trying to solve problems.  Aljazeera did while forecasting how Pennsylvania will handle pipeline common carrier use of eminent domain. In the last few years, the Texas Supreme Court has been rolling back the power of eminent domain in favor of stronger private property rights. The effects of the Tea Party are pervasive, and private property rights are de rigueur.  [Aljazeera America]

Texas RRC Common Carrier Rule Making- Check Mate to the Legislature?

  • July 11, 2014

RRC staff recommendations approved this week clarify when a pipeline may call itself a common carrier. It’s a response to the 2013 Legislature’s failed fix, which was publicly killed on a point of order.
 
This chess game began when a court called into question whether a pipeline was a common carrier. The court thereby restrained the pipeline’s use of eminent domain.  It was a huge win for landowners. 
 
When you need land to build pipelines, eminent domain authority is like a Queen on a chess board. It helps you move wherever you want. Its powerful. 
 
Within months, the Legislature, Entities with Eminent Domain Authority, and the Tea Party will be vying for an eminent domain win. The Tea Party reigns supreme over private property rights. Historically, data shows that pro-private property rights bills pass overwhelmingly. [RRC Rule Proposal with Public Comment Until 8/25/2014] 

Woody Guthrie got it Wrong- This Land is My Land, This land is definitely NOT your Land (if you’re a condemning entity)

  • June 20, 2014

Houston Business Journal names land rights, a top legal issue in energy.  

Hello Drought; Meet the Tea Party

  • June 13, 2014

Drought is Gaelic for “Must move water to needed areas.” Tea Party is modern English for “We love private property. We detest eminent domain.” What happens when drought and Tea Party meet? Is it love at first sight? No. Its a water infrastructure quagmire. [National Eminent Domain Blog (Quoting the Ft. Worth Star Telegram)]

New Compensation Method for Eminent Domain: The Special Purpose Development Corporation

  • May 23, 2014

A modern compensation method for eminent domain is on the horizon. The Center for Rural Affairs discusses utilizing market driven compensation for rural land owners facing transmission line siting through their property.
Will it be out with fair market value and in with market driven compensation? [Center for Rural Affairs]

Texas Tea Party Requests Information Concerning Eminent Domain from a Texas Water District

  • May 23, 2014

In what is likely a nod to future events, the Texas Tea Party Caucus has requested public documents from Tarrant Regional Water District. The allegations include “a long-running eminent domain scheme.” 
Strategic use of legal public information requests is de rigueur in Texas politics. {Breibart]

A U.S. Senator asks, “How will land owners be compensated?"

  • May 16, 2014

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) wants to buy wind energy from Oklahoma. Oklahoma and Tennessee share no borders. To bring wind energy to TN, it requires 700 miles of transmission lines through Arkansas. 
 
My solution on how to build 700 miles of transmission lines through Arkansas: Football. Let the Sooners, Cowboys, Razorbacks, and Volunteers decide if the plan moves forward. If the Volunteers beat either Oklahoma team, then there’s a deal. If, the Razorbacks beat the Volunteers and either the Sooners or Cowboys, then eminent domain is off the table. 
 
Naturally, a project of this magnatiude caught the attention of U.S. Senator Lamar Alexander (TN) and Congressman Fincher (TN). These gentlemen in lieu of settling this issue via football, sent a letter with 11 questions about the TVA proposal.  They raised 4 eminent domain questions. 3 of the 4 eminent domain questions focus on how land owners will be compensated. Compensating land owners is a hot topic. It’s usually the issue that causes law suits. For the entire list of questions see the article in the Chattanoogan.