Transportation
An editorial at the Milwaukee Wisconsin Journal Sentinel recommends 3 ways to increase trasnportation funding:
“Officials at the Texas port are rethinking how they use their land amid a flurry of construction by energy companies and soaring volumes of oil and petroleum products moving through the port, Executive Director John LaRue said in an interview with WSJ Logistics Report. A 40% plunge in the price of crude in the last year hasn’t dented traffic, he said.”
The details:
Texas Oil Boom Fuels Corpus Christi Port Growth | WallStreet Journal
Vic Suhm, the executive director of the Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition, believes in his heart of hearts that Texas “still needs to figure out a long term funding mechanism that is less dependent on gas tax.”
“That’s clearly something that I think will not go away,” he says. “That’ll be here next session, too.”
IH-635 East Legislative Caucus formed to continue development of the highway, running from U.S. 75 to I-30.
The caucus members:
Alexandria Virginia’s long time mayor was unseated by the only city official, Vice Mayor Allison Silberberg (D), to respond to an outdry after a Halloween hit and run left a 7 year old hospitalized.
The city official worked to get speed bumps installed on the busy street, and checked in with the family of the vicitim.
Speed bumps and the personal touch won her the election to defeat a long standing incumbent, a former mayor, and a third candidate.
““Not only are we dedicating more money to building roads, we’re also ending diversions and as a result, providing greater transparency,” said Governor Abbott. “This legislation will have a tremendous and positive impact on the lives of people across the State of Texas.”
Overall pretty good not shabby by the agency that once misplaced $1billion. The State Auditor Office raised these issues with TXDOT construction contracts:
Most of this will be handled by SB 20, which has provisions for docuemnt retention and audits.
Republicans and Democrats joining forces raising questions over whether in the sharing economy that ride share calls home, are drivers indpendent contracts or are they employees who aren’t receiving the benefit of employment?
Liberal Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) to a Republican member of the National Labor Relations Board are leaning toward the latter- that the drivers are employees and that companies are avoiding paying benefits.
Rest assured, Liberals and Republicans rational is rooted in different places. The liberals are primarily concerned about the worker and the republicans are concerned about how the economy adapts.
It’s an issue being litigated in court, but some think the NLRB may act first. The FTC is hosting a sharing economy symposium in July. The Hill
Viriginia is rethinking whether it saves money with public private partnerships. Spefically, when the P3 investments involve infrastructure like transportation. The state is considering design-build and bond financing to save state revenue on future transportation projects.
The change of heart from the state that has been actively using P3s for 20 years, is controversy. The details:
” The most significant controversy involved a proposed 55-mile toll road linking the Norfolk area to Interstate 95, a major commercial corridor along the East Coast.The project started as a P3 but morphed into a more conventional contract, albeit one shrouded in the type of secrecy that had been afforded to those public-private deals.”
How the Republican Caucus is talking about transporation funding from the 2015 Legislature:
“SJR 5 is a bipartisan resolution that transfer up to $2.5 billion annually of general sales tax revenue to the State Highway Fund, beginning in 2018. Given conservative estimates, this measure could increase transportation funding by $3 billion annually beginning in 2020.
“SJR 5 would allocate more funding for much-needed transportation projects without raising taxes or fees,” said Simmons. “By capturing existing revenue, we can enhance our state’s transportation infrastructure without placing additional burdens on taxpayers.”
The proposed constitutional amendment also includes measures that allow for flexibility to the transfer should there be a downturn in the economy and collections. If collections for a fiscal year are below $28 billion, then no money will be transferred from the general sales tax collections to the State Highway Fund.” Rep. Ron Simmons
Arlington elected a new mayor in May. According to Empower Texas, the new mayor succeeded based on opposition to red light cameras.
The Legislature cannot seal the deal on red light camera opposition, but the voting public of Arlington can.
Uptown District and Metro have developed a plan to use the center lane of Post Oak Blvd in Houston as a dedicated bus lane.
It is said the proposal will reduce congestion, as more Houstonians opt for park and ride. Uptown Houston PAC has gathered signatures from 1,000 businesses and property owners in opposition to the proposal.
Transportation Controversy is nothing new to Houston. Empower Texas points instead to the Uptown TIRZ and argues that:
“We have mentioned a number of times that TIRZ best serve the taxpayers when there is a high level of transparency and a specific goal in mind. When these unelected boards are given access to a pot of taxpayer funds, they will go to great lengths to find ways to spend it. Repeatedly the line between economic development and personal interest projects is crossed with little accountability.” Empower Texas
Nevada Assembly Bill 175 passed this week to round out a package of ride share legislation. Nevada will now:
Allow ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft to operate in the state.
Ride share will be regulated by the Nevada Transportation Authority rather than the Public Utilities Commission.
Legalizes companies that allow people to hail a ride through a smartphone and imposes a 3% fee on taxi and ride share fares.
You can now see TXDMV board meetings live streamed. Welcome to 2005.
To Watch Meetings: http://www.txdmv.gov/about-us/txdmv-board-meetings
TPPF calls HB 20 a good bill when it left the House in April, but makes these comments about HB 20 after Senate amendments:
High Speed Rail escaped the conference committee on House Bill 1, without the provision removing its ability to be granted the power of eminent domain.
The no votes by the conferees were:
More fights are on the horizon as Texas Central Railways seeks to aquire land and requisite funding to build the Dallas-Houstonn high speed rail.
California Legislature is moving a measure to permit carpooling by ride share comapnies.
California has an existing statutory framework for ride-share and a regulatory framework through the California Public Utilities Commission.
In 2014 California increased insurance requirements on ride-share. In 2015 it is also moving a long statutory criminal background check requirements for ride-share.
New York Mayor Blasio is proposing new ride share regulations that will require ride share comapnies to pay NYC $1,000 for each user upgrade to their ride share mobile apps.
A public hearing is being held May 28th. The proposed city regulation emerged 9 days after the mayor appeared at a large tech conference, TechCrunch Disrupt, held in Manhattan, where the Mayor, naturally pledged support for the industry.
The Veterans Affairs National Cemetery in Texas was to get a new sign. Then it was discovered the sign misspelled cemetery. A new, new sign is on its way.
Government Officials blame the private contractor.
The new $10 peak time toll for I-10 in Houston sparked a Washington Post blub about the Texas toll prices. $10 for 12 miles. But, apparently Virigina has Texas beat with $16 for 14 miles..
4 million tons crossed the Port docks last month. This represents a 23% increase.
The Port is up 11% for the year. having already handled more than 13 million tons of cargo. It represents $103 million in revneue for the year, up 30% over year to date for last year.
CATO is suggesting to Congress that should cut $13 Billion in spending to help with the federal transportation funding reauthorization. The Hill
Colorado led the nation as the first state to adopt modern ride-share legislation. Since then 16 other states have followed suit.
Legislative success since has been more challenging. Kansas Governor Brownback veoted a ride-share bill. Florida did not pass its ride-share legislation. Texas is poised to follow suit. Same goes for Iowa and Nevada.
HB 1 Conferee agreement on Rider 48 of the Transportation Article in the state budget would prohibit TXDOT from expending any funds for Texas Central Rail.
Central Rail is waiting to hear what fate will bring.
Probably yes, the ballot language was ok for the 2001 Mobility Fund. The Mobility Fund moved Texas from pay as we go building of roads to secure long term obligations.
Welcome to New York City, home of regulating app. NYC Taxing and Limousine Commission is proposing new rules to require:
” smartphone app operators “must apply for approval of a modification” for certain changes to any app used to arrange vehicle rides for hire.”
Ride Share companies say: the proposal “effectively grant the commission veto power over software updates”
The city says: don’t worry, we’re just…” “codify[ing] basic safety and consumer protection requirements that most apps have already adopted, and, to a large extent, it is their best practices that are the backbone of the rules.”
A few weeks ago a representative from the group pushing the Texas Central High Speed Rail said that the project couldn’t happen in Texas without eminent domain.
The response from the opponents: “Eminent domain = free market? The free market includes both a willing buyer and willing seller. Eminent domain, by definition, does not.”
California allows testing self driving cars on public roads. 4 of the 50 permitted cars have gotten into accidents since September.
Of the 4 accidents, 2 were caused by the self driving equipment, 2 were caused by the driver operating the self driving car. 0 of the 4 were actually liable for the accidents. There are a lot of bad human drivers in California it seems.
Expansion of Tomball Tollway (State Highway 249) will lead to increased sales tax revenue according to the Tomball Economic Development Corporation.
Increased mobility brings more consumers and thereby brings more commerical development.
NYTimes reports on how self driving car features are a reality without legislation addressing self driving cars. lawyers say without aws agaisnt it, these features are likely legal.
Five “states” have legalized self driving cars:
Georgia Governor signed a new transportation funding bill that raises transportation funding by:
The Colorado Legislature failed to reach an agreement on transportation funding. The House & The Senate both wanted to ensure ensure $1 billion in general-fund transfers to the Highway Users Trust Fund. How they got to that point varied.
The House wanted to address a hospital provider fee and turn it into an economic development fund to free up a revenue cap.
Colorado hasn’t spent state general revenue onn transportation since 2007.
On Tuesday Michigan voters defeated a $1.2billion in trasnportation funding. Supporters of the ballot initiaitve spent $9 million, while opponents spent $200,000.
Michigan isn’t the first state to vote down increased transportaiton funding recently. Missouri did so as well in 2014.
Cameron County Judge Suplevada announced that the new US-Mexico bridge will open in July. Background:
Expiring Revenue Enhancement is the key phrase, and it requires:
Seantors Huffines, Hall and Ellis join forces to support Senator Ellis’ bill to stop the driver responsiblity program. The program can result in hefty surcharges for individuals to retain their driver’s license.
After buttering Texas up by flattering its innovated use of public private partnerships in transportation, a Harvard Kennedy School fellow. He praises this method because roads are paid for by those who directly benefit from those roads.
Pivoting from flattery, he posits that opposition to tollroads and prublic private partnerships will:
Self driving cars are good for Nevada and California, but bring pause when Texas tries to legislate self driving car testing.
Google and Automakers don’t appear to want self driving car legislation in Texas. Google registered opposed to Senator Ellis’ SB 1167 that seeks to set up a framework for testing self driving cars in Texas. Why?
14 elected officials have asked the Texas Congressional to request federal regulators stop high speed rail in Texas. The blessing of federal regulators will garner eminent domain powers for the high speed rail.
Simultaneously, TXDOT has created a high speed rail commission led by Ft. Worth businessman Bill Meadows to explore extending the Dallas-Houston jhigh speed rail to Arlington and Ft. Worth.
While we wait to see what the Legislature does with ride-share, Mayor Parker is asking that Uber submit a compliance plan to the City of Houston.
Uber has until Friday to comply. Houston is eager to match drivers to drivers licenses after the alleged April 2015 sexual assault of a passenger by an Uber driver.
TXDOT is getting closer to additional funding. The House and Senate transportation proposal both relate to sales tax and here’s the differences:
Peak toll pricing helps pay for roads, but does not help reduce congestion according to the nternational Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association. Two case studies:
The Chair of a New York legislative committee is proposing the creation of a transportation finance authority that would fund transportation with:
While Texas Central Railway openly talks to landowners, California is building a state financed high speed rail.
On Friday, California’s Public Works Board voted to condemn 38 more pieces of property. in total, the state has condemned 192 land parcels to build high speed rail. In total, they need 1,300 parcels of property.
The very next day Texas Central Railway held a public meeting in Montgomery County. During that discussion, Robert Eckles, President of the Texas Central Railway, made clear that ” “We aren’t a California style project.” YourNewsHouston
Texas Central Rail is keeping a up a public meeting schedule. On Saturday April 11, 2015, they held a meeting in Montgomery County. the Highlights:
The Courier Montgomery County TX
Eminent Domain
Building the high speed rail will grant a private entity, the Texas Central Railway, the power of eminent domain. Private entities with eminent domain are out of vogue in Texas.
Public Funding
Opposition claims that if ridership goals are not met, public funds will be applied to the project.
Roads First
HB 1889 by Metcalf seeks to cease rail building and promote road building. From the author:
“We need more roads for citizens to travel to ease our existing roadways,” Metcalf said. “We do not need a high-speed railway in Texas that will only benefit a few, while at the same time disturbing thousands of citizens within its path.”
The Atlantic CityLab Ft Worth Star Telegram
Ride Share moved from local issue affecting local ordinances in San Antonio, Austin, Dallas, and Houston to a statewide solution.
HB 2440 by Repsentative Paddie was heard in House Transportation. Statewide solutions for ride share on the horizon. Cab companies testified in opposition:
Texas Association Business President Bill Hammond wrote in TribTalk about a need for a statewide solution. His points:
On a less happy note, an uber driver in Houston made headlines, when it was discovered that the driver was a felon, and accused of sexually assaulting a passenger. Houston Chronicle
A new rail bridge is opening near Brownsville, which has been trying for 15 years to move the current Matamoros rail track out of downtown Brownsville. The move will improve safety by eliminating 14 car crossings.
A security checkpoint in Mexico will screen train traffic in both directions until the US security station is moved from its current location.
Mexico paid $80M of the cost and local governemtns in the U.S. $40M.
Texas Central High-Speed Railway accnounced a dozen public meetings from April 9th to the 24th to clear the air.
Texas Central High-Speed Railway touts the following benefits:
- 1000s of jobs for Texans
- no state funding required
- to show that they intend no at grade crossings
Local governments are passing resolutions in opposition. State Representative Will Metcalf stated his opposition by saying, “
“We need more roads for citizens to travel to ease our existing roadways. We do not need a High Speed Railway in Texas that will only benefit a few, while at the same time disturbing thousands of citizens.” Houston Chronicle
A nonprofit group of archeologists in Florida are vocalizing opposition to a high speed rail plan because the high speed rail will block their ability to recover artifacts. Other opposition includes:
Their lawsuit in federal court asks the court to void the bonds backing the high speed rail. Courthouse News Service
Texas has generated $17.6 Million in revenue from speciality license plates.
Squeaking by in a 5-4 vote, Senate Transportation Committee passed SB 1601 by Kolkhorst. the bill removes eminent domain authority for high speed rail.
The High Speed Rail proponents say federal law, alone, doesn’t provide the tools that will help them to build their rail. 1190 Talk Radio Dallas
Recommending a funding solution for transportation works best when the people recommending the solution aren’t elected officials.
Look at Georgia, they had a special committee recommend suggestions and now a new transportation solution is sittin gon the Governor’s Desk. Washington Times
Connecticut follows suit with Governor Malloy appointing a 10 member Council to create a “coordinated, cohesive strategy” for transportation needs. Governor Malloy supports a funding mix including:
State Sen. Anthony Cannella, R-Ceres, represents the 12th District. A civil engineer, he is vice chairman of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee.
Highlighting a Texas Turf Anti-Toll protest, Bloomberg looks at the battles waging against toll roads.
Bloomberg also siezes on a Texas A&M Transportation Institute statistic to support toll roads : “$121 billion in wasted time and fuel in 2011, or $818 per commuter.”
Rep. Scott Sanford is also quoted as saying, ” “If a core function of government is transportation — building and maintaining roadways — that means whatever a citizen pays for that core government function is a tax. What we end up with is taxation without representation.”
New York City has more Uber drivers than cab drivers.
More and more big trucks are on the roads, hauling goods to and fro. Good for the economy. Bad for public safety according to troopers who the New York times labels as unwittingly lobbying for an increase in rail.
Naturally the rail industry wants more rail and the trucking industry wants more and bigger trucks on the road. The rail industry is ginning up support from troopers through a non-profit.
Transportation agencies throughout the US have tapped creative earning strategies to enable their assets to generate more transportation funding:
House Bill 3825 by Rep. Landgraf would transfer $50 million per year from the Rainy Day Fund to Texas counties to help offset the impact of oil and gas drilling operations.
Chairman Darby has issued a statement in support.
This week, TPPF released, the Road Forward, a transportation reform proposal.
The Dallas-Houston private high speed rail proposal presented to Cy Fair Chamber of Commerce this week. Former Harris County Judge Eckles, who leads the Texas Central High-Speed Railway (TCHSR), presented these facts about high speed rail:
Refreshing our Recollection: Senator Kolkhorst’s Senate Bill 1601 would prohibit TCHSR from using eminent domain.
Senator Uresti’s SB 1788 would allow counties, producing oil and gas revenue, would be allowed to keep the royalty payments generated from the minerals under county property and dedicate that money to road funding.
This bill would override a 1960 Attorney General Opinion, WW-870, by Attorney General Will Wilson.
California was one fo the first states to create a regulatory framework for testing self driving cars. Way back in yesteryear, 2012, California created its landscape for regulating selfd-riving car testing.
A regulatory hiccup, in the form of no rulemaking to verify safety, has caused California’s innovativeness to stall. It seems no one can agree on the standards that should be imposed upon automotive makers that determine whether self driving cars are safe for the road. The competing views are:
For now the California DMV permits the cars to be tested on public roads but as of yet, car makers cannot move beyond testing.
Harvard Kennedy School Professor Stephen Goldsmith holds out the LBJ Freeway as an example of how P3s (public-private partnerships) are delivering value.
Relying on Fitch Ratings issued in February, Goldsmith describes the LBJ Freeway as construction “has proceeded on schedule and on budget, and operations are on target to begin during 2015.”
Move Texas Forward mentions the following transportation funding proposals but takes no position:
In an effort to speed up the construction of high speed rail between the Twin Cities and Rochester, MN is considering private funding for high speed rail. MPR News
The Trinity Toll road in Dallas is financially drowning.
What entity has oversight and control?
How much a financial problem is there?
The Solution:
According to the Corsicana Daily Sun, Governor Abbott opposes tollroads—“period.”
Rep. Martinez filed HB 3040 to allow economic development corporations to build transportation infrastrcture.
Refreshing our recollection, Chairman Pickett asked about County Transportation Reinvestment Zones but Attorney General Opinion said the Texas constitution probably prohibits it.
Previously on Information Intelligence:
Attorney General Opinion, KP-004, tells us without a constitutional amendment, a county probably cannot:
The AG rational is that:
Miami-Dade is proposing a Public Private Partnership , P3, solution to help address its roadway congestion.
Currently the area uses P3 solutions for recapitalizing Miami’s infrastructure, expanding options for mass transit, and incorporating modern design and innovative operational techniques.
P3 for transportation congestion differs from normal contracting by:
Lyft has been fighting a law suit over whether its drivers are employees or indpendent contractors. This determination is crucial to determine how much liability Lyft may have if something bad happens or in reimbursing its drivers for expenses.
A San Fracnisco judge denied summary judgment motions and ruled that a jury should determine whther the ride share drivers are employees or independent contractors.
Since the times of yesteryear ,and the Trans Texas Corridor, toll roads have fallen out of favor. As of 48 hours before bill filing deadline, there are 32 ways to stop tolls, stop enforcing certain tolls, or remove authority from toll roads.
How to chip away at or eliminate toll roads:
Senator Ellis has filed SB 1167. He creates a pilot program to allow for testing of self driving cars in Texas.
Under his pilot, certain people, that get a self driving car designation for their drivers license, and are either:
will be permitted to test drive the cars of the future in Texas.
Previously on Information Intelligence:
Leading the pack with HB 933, Guillen throws Texas hat into the ring for testing self driving cars and creates a border security pilot program.
Here’s what else has happened with self-driving car regulations throughout the US:
A legislative move in California is seeking to level the playing field between ride share drivers and taxi drivers. The bill died in committee last session.
This sessions’s Assembly Bill 24 “requires amateur drivers to submit to drug and alcohol testing, undergo criminal background checks overseen by the California Department of Justice and enroll in a Department of Motor Vehicles program alerting employers after DUI arrests.”
US DOT is allowing cities and states to require that local workers are utilized on transportation projects which receive federal funding.
U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx announced the beginning of the pilot program this week. The one-year pilot program only applies to transportation funding received from the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration.
Senator Nichols SJR 5 & SB 5 would add $2.5Billion to TXDOT funding by dedicating motor vehicle sales tax to TXDOT. TXDOT would be prohibited from using the funding for toll roads.
After passing restrictive local regulations that could cease Uber, Lyft, and ride share operations. San Antonio is proposing revisions that, if approved Thursday, would:
Courtesy of the new LBB report that examines 34 transportation funding options:
Attorney General Opinion, KP-004, tells us without a constitutional amendment, a county probably cannot:
The AG rational is that:
An earnest supporter of property rights, Representative Will Metcalf filed HB 1889 that requires municipal or county approval before construction of the railway. Representative Metcalf is strongly opposed to taking private lands for private enterprise.
Metcalf’s opposition to high speed rail is noted at NoTexasHighSpeedRail & Texas Turf.
The growing list of supporters for Senator Nichols SB 5 & SJR 5:
The results of the Texas A&M Transportation Institute’s Transportation Policy Research Center transportation poll:
California taxi drivers filed suit claiming unequal protection under the laws, because of the unequal regulation on taxi drivers versus Uber/Lyft drivers.
The goal: Treat taxi regulation and ride share regulation equally.
North Carolina Department of Transportation has the authority to determine what land is in a transportation corridor. Sounds innocuous. But, by classifying land as in a transportation corridor, it can also trigger land use restrictions. The land use restrictions tend to make the land cheaper for the state to buy later. Good for the state to keep transportation project costs down, not good for landowners who think their land is more valuable.
As we’ve seen in Texas, restricting how land can be used is controversial. People sue. People change the law. Think of the landowners who sue when fracking bans are placed on their land, because they are unable to make the highest and fullest use of their land. Land is valuable to the people who own it and they want to make decisions about their land.
NC Courts looked at lands designated as within transportation corridor plus the land use restrictions, and said that’s effectively the state using eminent domain. This means compensation for eminent domain dates to designating the property within a transportation corridor, not when eminent domain discussions begin. It matters to the value of the property to landowners and how much a governmental entity will have to pay to acquire it.
Empower Texas has a litany of transportation reform ideas:
Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) is examining transportation reinvestment zones. TTI Senior Research Scientist Rafael Aldrete is leading the project & is asking for information from counties and cities. The goals of the study:
New information emerges about the path of Texas first high speed rail line between Dallas and Houston. The route will:
The goals:
Administrative Process and Timeline:
SB 579 (Watson) & HB 1432 (Howard) would permit a $10 Travis County registration fee to fund Travis County transportation funding, or permit a $20 fee with voter approval.
The added transportation funds would go to the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, would be utilized for transportation bond packages, which may include tollroads.
Other counties have been granted the similar registration fee surcharges, including Cameron, Hidalgo, Webb, El Paso and Bexar. Statesman
Refreshing Recollection: Vehicle User fees are proposed as a state wide solution in California, in combination with local sales tax increases dedicated for transportation. Information Intelligence
57% of southerners in Georgia support paying more at the pump for road improvements.
Georgia Chamber of Commerce commissioned the poll and found:
California is working on a 3 tiered approach to transportation funding:
Tier One: The State The state portion of transportation funding will be based in a $52 vehicle user fee.
Tier Two: Cities Cities are turning to financing models to improve transportation funding.
Tier Three: Regional Regional local governments are putting a 1/2 cent “quality of life tax” for transportation projects. it will require a 2/3 vote from local residents.
Uber & Lyft are extremely convenient for passengers. Their ease stems from their apps which quickly bring transportation to you. As a result, Uber/Lyft drivers are glued to their apps awaiting new fares. This focus on the next fare is leading to distracted driving, new laws and law suits.
In December 2014, a lawsuit was filed against a Lyft driver when the driver’s Lyft app was open when an accident occurred. In the same month, an Uber driver allegedly hit and killed a 6 year old in a San Francisco crosswalk. These incidents raise the following policy and legal issues that are being addressed across the country:
Its deja vu all over again. A foreign company finances a new transportation proposal. The foreign company has eminent domain authority. Opposition forms. Opposition gets stronger. The ultimate result: All eminent domain authority is repealed for the project.
10 years ago, it was Spanish Company, Cintra, and Trans Texas Corridor. Today it’s Japanese financed Texas Central Railway, which is proposing high-speed rail to connect Texas major metropolitan areas.
Previous opposition to the rail had been rural land owners, but newly organized opposition group, NoTexasCentral.Com, is suburban and urban based.
Tax experts say 12 states may likely raise the gas tax this year. It’s a bipartisan group, including:
Special Commissions have been studying transportation funding in these states:
To avoid raising taxes, Republicans in Connecticut unveiled a plan that is:
Republican Iowa Governor Branstad supports the 10 cent gas tax hike legislative leaders are pushing.
Alternative suggestions to the gas tax hike include legalizing marijuana and dedicating the tax revenues to transportation projects. The Gazette
Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.
Great things are just around the corner!